Is InterServer a Good Web Host? A 9-Month, Data-Driven Review

For the past nine months, I've been running a rigorous test on InterServer's web hosting. I purchased their $2/month plan, meticulously tracked performance, ran speed tests, and even compared it to a dozen other providers.

Now, it's time to answer the question: Is InterServer a good choice to host your website?

After nearly a year of data collection, I have a lot to say. Let's dive into the details.

👋1. First Impressions: A Clunky, Confusing Interface:

Let's start with the biggest drawback: the user interface.

I believe the worst thing about InterServer is its control panel. It's confusing, especially for a first-time website owner. For example, even though I only purchased web hosting, my dashboard actively displays every single service InterServer offers twice with most sections being completely empty.

To actually work on my website, I had to click one of the smallest buttons on the screen to access the real control panel. This is where you can install WordPress, create email accounts, and set up backups the important stuff.

The entire experience feels like it was built by an engineer, not a designer. InterServer seems to operate on a mentality of "it needs to work well, not look good," sacrificing ease of use and aesthetics for raw functionality.

The Silver Lining: It's Snappy and Functional

And you know what? That mentality pays off. The interface is incredibly snappy. There's no lag or excessive loading screens. You'll likely only use a handful of buttons before forgetting the interface exists altogether. After the initial setup, it becomes smooth sailing.

2. Setting Up a Website: A Straightforward Process:

Creating my test website was simple using InterServer's automatic WordPress installer. I just needed to create my login details and press install. No problems here.

Of course, the default WordPress installation looks... well, like a default WordPress site. To create a realistic test, I downloaded a pre-made template from Envato Elements. I chose this method because most people build sites this way, and these templates are often poorly optimized with excess code providing a true test of performance, not just an ideal scenario.

📈 3. Performance Deep Dive: Where the $2.50 Plan Shows Its Limits:

Once the design was loaded, I used the WP Benchmark plugin to test the server's performance. This is where the holes in the budget plan began to show.

• ✅ CPU & Memory: Good
• ✅ File System: Great
• ❌ Database Score: Pretty bad

After running the test three times, it was clear this server struggles with complex or large amounts of data uploaded in a short period, though it handles simple queries extremely well.

3.1 The Reason: Process Limits:

This makes perfect sense. InterServer's standard plans are limited to 30 processes per second.Think of it like trying to squeeze 31 people through a door at once it just doesn't work. You need a larger door.

That said, 30 is still generous. Other cheap hosts like Hostinger offer only 10, and Bluehost doesn't even disclose their limit (which is rarely a good sign).

4. Real-World Speed Test: How Does It Compare?

Theory is one thing real-world performance is another. I cloned my website onto Bluehost and Hostinger's premium plans and recorded the loading times in an incognito window.

The result? Bluehost was dead last, and InterServer came out first.

To understand why, I used GT Metrics. Here's the breakdown:

• InterServer Fully Loaded: 1.50 seconds
• Hostinger Fully Loaded: 2.12 seconds
• Bluehost Fully Loaded: 3.02 seconds. Almost 4 times slower

The key is the "Snowball Effect" of website loading. The first metric, Time to First Byte (TTFB), is crucial. InterServer's TTFB was 150ms, while Bluehost's was 400ms. That 250ms difference might seem small, but it cascades, slowing down every subsequent element that needs to load.

5. The Verdict: Who Is This Plan For?

🎯 My Recommendation:

I would NOT host a complex e-commerce store on this $2.50 plan, where users are constantly performing actions and interacting with the database. However, for blogs, small business brochure sites, and portfolios, it offers incredible value.

Performance Score: 6.9/10 — which is pretty incredible for just $2.50.

If you plan on running an e-commerce site or expect high traffic, check out InterServer's Boost 2 and Boost 4 plans, which scale resources very effectively.

InterServer Pricing: The Catch

Like many web hosts, InterServer uses introductory pricing.

• First Term: Discounted price (e.g., $2.50/month)
• Upon Renewal: Price increases to the standard rate of ~$7/month

The best deal is to lock in a two-year plan. You can also use our link with the code BrandoraLab to get your first month for just one cent, bringing the total for two years to around $57. You can deactivate the add-ons during checkout to save even more cash.

For a temporary project, the one-month plan for $2.50 is a fantastic, no-commitment option.

Final Conclusion

After nine months and spending roughly $20, I can confidently say this was some of the best money I've spent on web hosting. The performance and uptime are exceptional for the price.

I highly recommend you check out InterServer if you're looking for reliable, high-value hosting for a standard website.

FAQs